The downsides of commodifying Street Culture

January 13, 2022

In general, if someone or an organization like a business, can make a buck they will.

From the agricultural to utility sectors, this approach is the backbone of capitalism.

Recently, this phenomenon has been increasingly visible in the field, actions, and products produced in the realm of street culture (i.e., the beliefs, dispositions, ideologies, informal rules, practices, styles, symbols, and values associated with, adopted by, and engaged in by individuals and organizations that spend a disproportionate amount of time on the streets of large urban centers, Ross, 2018, p. 8).

From streetwear to street art, from street music to concert halls, and from ghettos and barrios to now gentrified parts of cities, there are an increasing number of items, situations/experiences, and places once derived (or originating) from, or that embody elements of street culture, but are then modified, marketed, and sold as products and services to interested consumers.

On the upside, this process of commodification (e.g., turning something into an object of value) can provide jobs, income, and opportunities for some individuals and communities.

And, I don’t have a beef with this approach as long as the original creators are

• acknowledged for their original ideas and hard work,
• fairly compensated for their ideas and work,
• treated fairly after their products and items make their way into the market place, and
• the products and services don’t lead to damaging externalities (i.e., killing the environment, etc.).

But that’s rarely the case.

Commodification of street culture usually results in a:

A. Distorting (or exaggerating) the original intent and meanings of the things and services emanating from street culture. In a world where honesty and authenticity are increasingly in short supply, these modifications distort intended meanings. This means that selected elements of the original products are overly simplified, reduced to tropes, or more specifically kitschified.

B. More importantly, the generative products and services usually do not appropriately compensate the original creators. And this is bad. Frequently there are no or minimal copyright, patent, and trademark protections for many creators and thus they can’t reap an economic benefit.

On the positive side, we are seeing scholars in different social science and fields examine the commodification of lots of processes, including selected elements of street culture, and this is great to see. More light, however, needs to be shed on this topic in order to better contextualize its’ dynamics and better guide its development.

Criminologist @ubaltmain #corrections #CrimesofthePowerful #StreetCulture #graffiti #streetart #police Co-founder #ConvictCriminology www.jeffreyianross.com

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

The 5 Best Non-Racist Name Changes for Washington’s NFL Team, Ranked

Spring Makeup Tips

Voting Today? Use Our Resource Guide for a Smoother Process

Graphic by Maggie Chirdo.

here are the 50% off Nodaleto babies that all fashionistas covet

Don’t Be Late for Incredibles 2

Nobody Likes Doing Secret Santa at Work

This Black Man Says He Likes to “Role-Play as a Runaway Slave” During Sex With White Women.

Let’s go to the theatre!

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Jeffrey Ian Ross, Ph.D.

Jeffrey Ian Ross, Ph.D.

Criminologist @ubaltmain #corrections #CrimesofthePowerful #StreetCulture #graffiti #streetart #police Co-founder #ConvictCriminology www.jeffreyianross.com

More from Medium

Notes : 06 Dec

Tiny Cruelties

HMS Toolkit

Ethics For Fun at LAU